Ratio, root, comparison and alternating series tests
You learn the ratio, root and comparison tests for positive-term series, the alternating series test for sign-changing series, and absolute/conditional convergence. At the end of the page there is a decision table showing which test to choose when.
Last week you saw the geometric series, the nth-term test and the integral test. The integral test is powerful but does not work for terms that cannot be integrated (factorials, , complicated fractions). This week we add four tools that you will use far more often. The series part of the exam almost always comes as “Determine whether the series converges or diverges. Name the test you use.” Choosing the right test is half the job; writing the conditions of the test is the other half.
Golden rules:
- The nth-term test first. If the term does not go to zero, no other test is needed.
- If you see a factorial or an exponential (, ), use the ratio test. If the whole term is an th power, the root test.
- If there are only powers, roots, logarithms of , compare (mostly limit comparison) with a p-series.
- If the sign changes, first look at the absolute value; if it does not converge absolutely, move to the alternating series test.
- If the ratio or root test gives , the test gives no result. You cannot write “converges” or “diverges”.
The ratio test
Theorem. Let .
- If the series converges absolutely (and therefore converges).
- If or it diverges.
- If the test is inconclusive.
Intuition. For large , , so in the tail the series behaves like a geometric series with ratio . A geometric series converged when .
Example 1. .
Converges. In the factorial cancellation we used . Memorize this and the pattern .
Example 2. . The ratio is . Converges.
PITFALL · . (divergent) and (convergent) both give in the ratio test. So for rational expressions with polynomials or roots, the ratio test can never decide. Do not waste time on these series, move on to comparison.
The root test
Theorem. . The conclusions are the same as the ratio test: converges absolutely, diverges, no result.
The root test is unrivaled when the term has the form , because the th root removes the exponent.
Example 3. . . Converges.
Helpful limits: , . For example, for , .
Comparison tests
These two tests are used only for positive-term series (at least from some point on).
Direct comparison. If for every :
- converges converges.
- diverges diverges.
Example 4. . and is a convergent geometric series. Converges.
Limit comparison. If and
then and either both converge or both diverge. Extreme cases: if and converges, then converges; if and diverges, then diverges.
How do you choose ? Keep only the highest-degree terms of the numerator and denominator. Drop the constant coefficients.
a_n = (n+1)/(n^3+2) → dominant: n/n^3 = 1/n^2 → b_n = 1/n^2
a_n = (3n^2 - 1)/sqrt(n^5+n) → dominant: n^2/n^(5/2) = 1/n^(1/2) → b_n = 1/sqrt(n)
a_n = 1/(n - ln n) → dominant: 1/n → b_n = 1/n
Example 5. . With : . converges, so the series converges.
TIP · why limit comparison? In direct comparison the direction of the inequality is critical and often comes out reversed. , that is, it is bigger than a convergent series, and direct comparison says nothing. In limit comparison the direction does not matter: the ratio goes to , done.
The alternating series test
Theorem (Leibniz). In the series , if
- ,
- is decreasing (, from some point on),
then the series converges.
Example 6. The alternating harmonic series All three conditions hold, so it converges (its sum is ). But its absolute value is the harmonic series, which diverges.
Error estimate. If the conditions hold, the difference between and the true sum is smaller than the first term dropped:
Example 7. If you compute the sum of with , the error is at most .
Absolute and conditional convergence
| Case | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Absolutely convergent | converges | |
| Conditionally convergent | converges, diverges | |
| Divergent | diverges |
Theorem. Every absolutely convergent series is convergent. That is why, for series with irregular signs (those containing , ), you switch to the absolute value and compare.
The template for an “absolutely, conditionally, or diverges?” question in the exam:
1) lim a_n ≠ 0 ? → diverges (done)
2) Does Σ|a_n| converge? (p-series, comparison, ratio) → if yes, ABSOLUTELY
3) If not: alternating series test (b_n decreasing, → 0) → if it holds, CONDITIONALLY
Which test? The decision table
| What do you see in the term? | The first test to try | Example |
|---|---|---|
| is clear | nth-term test (diverges) | |
| the form | geometric series | |
| p-series | ||
| , , | ratio test | |
| Term | root test | |
| powers and roots of (rational) | limit comparison ( = ratio of the dominant terms) | |
| a bounded factor , | direct comparison with | |
| first , then the alternating test | ||
| is easy to integrate (, ) | integral test | |
| difference of fractions, partial fractions | telescoping (the sum can be found) |
Mixed examples: choosing the test
Example 8. . There is an exponential term. Ratio: . Converges. (Direct comparison would also work: .)
Example 9. . Only powers. Dominant: . The limit comparison ratio , , converges.
Example 10. . The absolute value is , diverges. and for , , decreasing. The alternating test holds: conditionally convergent.
Example 11. . It looks like a root test case but be careful: the term itself . It diverges by the nth-term test. The root test here gives and would be silent; if you had skipped the first step you would have been stuck.
Common mistakes
| Wrong | Correct |
|---|---|
| Writing “converges” when the ratio test gives | No result; another test |
| Applying the ratio test to a rational series | Always ; use limit comparison |
| The wrong direction in direct comparison | Be smaller for convergence, bigger for divergence |
| Comparison on a series with negative terms | Only for positive terms; first |
| Not checking that it is decreasing in the alternating test | must be decreasing; show |
| Thinking the alternating test proves “diverges” | If the condition fails the test is silent; go back to the nth-term test |
| Calling a conditionally convergent series “absolutely” | Check separately |
| Using in the error estimate | The first dropped term: |
Test yourself
Exam-style questions. Solve them on paper first, then reveal the answer.
Determine whether converges.
Show answer
There is an exponential term, so the ratio test. ., the series converges. (The sum comes out as , but the question only asks about the fate.)
Determine whether converges.
Show answer
There is a factorial, so the ratio test. ., diverges. (Do not be fooled because the first few terms shrink; after the terms grow.)
Determine whether converges.
Show answer
The whole term is an th power, so the root test. . Converges.
Determine whether converges.
Show answer
Dominant terms: . Limit comparison with :, and . is a convergent p-series (), so the given series converges too.
Determine whether converges.
Show answer
For large , . With : .
The harmonic series diverges, so the given series diverges too.
Direct comparison does not work here: the inequality goes in the wrong direction.
Does converge absolutely, converge conditionally, or diverge?
Show answer
Absolute value: , , diverges. Not absolutely convergent.
Alternating series test: is positive, decreasing and . The series converges.
It converges but not absolutely: conditionally convergent.
Does converge?
Show answer
, so the terms oscillate around and do not go to zero.
It diverges by the nth-term test. The "" condition of the alternating series test is not satisfied; that test cannot be applied here.
Does converge absolutely?
Show answer
The signs of the terms are irregular, so the alternating series test cannot be used. Look at the absolute value: and converges.
By direct comparison converges, so the series is absolutely convergent (and therefore convergent).
How many terms of are needed to guarantee, by the alternating series estimation theorem, an error less than ?
Show answer
The error is . Wanted: , that is, , .
If you take the bound is exactly , and "less than" is not satisfied. The smallest .
(The actual error for is about .)
Determine whether converges.
Show answer
., diverges. (Since anyway, the nth-term test would also have been enough.)
Determine whether converges.
Show answer
grows more slowly than any power, and the denominator is generous for convergence. Limit comparison with : (L'Hôpital).
If the limit is and converges (), then converges too.
(Comparing with gives limit and says nothing.)
Does converge absolutely, converge conditionally, or diverge?
Show answer
Absolute: (), larger than the harmonic series, diverges.
Alternating test: . Decreasing: , (). Decreasing for , which is enough.
The series converges but not absolutely: conditionally convergent.
Verification: Ratio and root limits were checked at large n using logarithms (without overflow), limit comparison ratios at large n, and the sums of convergent series and alternating series error estimates with partial sums of millions of terms in node (verify/MAT1052/04.mjs).